Influence of harvest method on the quality and storage of highbush blueberry

Abstract

Blueberry quality is one of the most important elements that needs to be evaluated when automatisation processes, such as harvest automation, occur along the supply chain. The aim of this work was to evaluate the suitability of two blueberry cultivars, of new introduction for the area of study, to the mechanical harvest. Particularly the influence of harvest method was evaluated on the quality of cv. Cargo® and Top Shelf® for a short storage time (max. 28 days) in normal atmosphere assuming so an immediate sale of blueberries. Samples mechanically harvested were compared in terms of qualitative performance with samples manually picked throught two activity carried on two years. In the activity 1 a preliminary laboratory test simulation of mechanical harvest was carried on to evaluate the attitude of both cultivars to the automatisation process and the berries were evaluated immediately after the harvest time. The activity 2 was aimed to evaluate the quality of berries mechanically harvested in field and after the storage process at 2 ± 1 °C and 90% RH in a cold room for 28 days under normal atmospheric conditions (NA). The higher percentage of shrivelled berries for the simulation of mechanical harvest samples (SEH) (activity 1) and berries harvested with the Easy Harvester machine® (EH samples) (activity 2) in the post-harvest period was probably due to the low % of pruin on berries skin content at the harvest time (0 days). All samples although achieved a quality assessment equivalent to still marketable berries after 28 days of storage. TSSC were significantly higher in the EH group for both years. TSSC and TA were higher in Cargo® than in Top Shelf®. In general the automatisation of the harvesting process did not significantly affect blueberry quality after storage.

Keywords

• Vaccinum corymbosum L.
• Mechanical harvest
• Softening
• Bruising
• Postharvest