Alzheimer’s Research & Therapy (Feb 2024)

Polygenic effects on the risk of Alzheimer’s disease in the Japanese population

  • Masataka Kikuchi,
  • Akinori Miyashita,
  • Norikazu Hara,
  • Kensaku Kasuga,
  • Yuko Saito,
  • Shigeo Murayama,
  • Akiyoshi Kakita,
  • Hiroyasu Akatsu,
  • Kouichi Ozaki,
  • Shumpei Niida,
  • Ryozo Kuwano,
  • Takeshi Iwatsubo,
  • Akihiro Nakaya,
  • Takeshi Ikeuchi,
  • the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative,
  • the Japanese Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-024-01414-x
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 1
pp. 1 – 20

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Polygenic effects have been proposed to account for some disease phenotypes; these effects are calculated as a polygenic risk score (PRS). This score is correlated with Alzheimer’s disease (AD)-related phenotypes, such as biomarker abnormalities and brain atrophy, and is associated with conversion from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to AD. However, the AD PRS has been examined mainly in Europeans, and owing to differences in genetic structure and lifestyle, it is unclear whether the same relationships between the PRS and AD-related phenotypes exist in non-European populations. In this study, we calculated and evaluated the AD PRS in Japanese individuals using genome-wide association study (GWAS) statistics from Europeans. Methods In this study, we calculated the AD PRS in 504 Japanese participants (145 cognitively unimpaired (CU) participants, 220 participants with late mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and 139 patients with mild AD dementia) enrolled in the Japanese Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (J-ADNI) project. In order to evaluate the clinical value of this score, we (1) determined the polygenic effects on AD in the J-ADNI and validated it using two independent cohorts (a Japanese neuropathology (NP) cohort (n = 565) and the North American ADNI (NA-ADNI) cohort (n = 617)), (2) examined the AD-related phenotypes associated with the PRS, and (3) tested whether the PRS helps predict the conversion of MCI to AD. Results The PRS using 131 SNPs had an effect independent of APOE. The PRS differentiated between CU participants and AD patients with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.755 when combined with the APOE variants. Similar AUC was obtained when PRS calculated by the NP and NA-ADNI cohorts was applied. In MCI patients, the PRS was associated with cerebrospinal fluid phosphorylated-tau levels (β estimate = 0.235, p value = 0.026). MCI with a high PRS showed a significantly increased conversion to AD in APOE ε4 noncarriers with a hazard rate of 2.22. In addition, we also developed a PRS model adjusted for LD and observed similar results. Conclusions We showed that the AD PRS is useful in the Japanese population, whose genetic structure is different from that of the European population. These findings suggest that the polygenicity of AD is partially common across ethnic differences.

Keywords