PLoS ONE (Jan 2017)

Comparison of the long-term clinical performance of a biodegradable and a titanium fixation system in maxillofacial surgery: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.

  • B Gareb,
  • N B van Bakelen,
  • G J Buijs,
  • J Jansma,
  • J G A M de Visscher,
  • Th J M Hoppenreijs,
  • J E Bergsma,
  • B van Minnen,
  • B Stegenga,
  • R R M Bos

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177152
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 5
p. e0177152

Abstract

Read online

BACKGROUND:Biodegradable fixation systems could reduce or eliminate problems associated with titanium removal of implants in a second operation. AIM:The aim of this study was to compare the long-term (i.e. >5 years postoperatively) clinical performance of a titanium and a biodegradable system in oral and maxillofacial surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS:The present multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) was performed in four hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients treated with a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) and/or a Le Fort-I osteotomy, and those treated for fractures of the mandible, maxilla, or zygoma were included from December 2006 to July 2009. The patients were randomly assigned to either a titanium (KLS Martin) or a biodegradable group (Inion CPS). RESULTS:After >5 years postoperatively, plate removal was performed in 22 of the 134 (16.4%) patients treated with titanium and in 23 of the 87 (26.4%) patients treated with the biodegradable system (P = 0.036, hazard ratio (HR) biodegradable (95% CI) = 2.0 (1.05-3.8), HR titanium = 1). Occlusion, VAS pain scores, and MFIQ showed good and (almost) pain free mandibular function in both groups. CONCLUSION:In conclusion, the performance of the Inion CPS biodegradable system was inferior compared to the KLS Martin titanium system regarding plate/screws removal in the abovementioned surgical procedures. TRIAL REGISTRATION:http://controlled-trials.com ISRCTN44212338.