Radiation (Sep 2024)

Rectal Spacer Placement for Anorectal Reirradiation of De Novo Rectal or Anal Cancer Following Prostate Radiation Therapy

  • Alexandra D. Dreyfuss,
  • John P. Navilio,
  • Neal Kim,
  • Andy Shim,
  • Paul B. Romesser,
  • Marsha Reyngold,
  • Michael J. Zelefsky,
  • Christopher H. Crane,
  • Carla Hajj

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/radiation4030019
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 4, no. 3
pp. 242 – 252

Abstract

Read online

Background: Pelvic reirradiation of de novo rectal or anal cancer after prior prostate cancer RT poses a significant risk of urinary and rectal fistula. In this report we describe the use of a rectal spacer to improve dosimetry and reduce this risk. Methods: Patients undergoing anorectal radiotherapy (RT) after prior prostate RT who had a rectal spacer placed prior to RT were identified in a prospective database. Patient, disease, and treatment characteristics were collected for these patients. Survival data were calculated from the end of RT. Radiation was delivered with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or proton beam therapy (PBT) following rectal spacer placement. Results: Rectal spacer placement with hydrogel injected transperineally under transrectal ultrasound guidance was successful in all five patients. MR/CT simulation 1–2 weeks post-spacer placement and IMRT or PBT delivered to a dose of 36–50 Gy in 24–30 fractions once or twice daily were tolerated well by all patients. The V100% of the PTV ranged from 62–100% and mean rectal and bladder dose ranged from 39–46 Gy and 16–40 Gy, respectively. At the last follow-up, three patients were alive and without evidence of disease up to 48 months out from treatment. There were no acute or late grade 3 or higher toxicities observed, but acute grade 2 proctitis was observed in all patients. Conclusions: The use of a rectal spacer placement to improve dosimetry of IMRT and PBT after prior prostate RT is safe and feasible in appropriately selected anorectal cancer patients.

Keywords