Genes (Mar 2021)

Whole Genome Sequencing in the Evaluation of Fetal Structural Anomalies: A Parallel Test with Chromosomal Microarray Plus Whole Exome Sequencing

  • Jia Zhou,
  • Ziying Yang,
  • Jun Sun,
  • Lipei Liu,
  • Xinyao Zhou,
  • Fengxia Liu,
  • Ya Xing,
  • Shuge Cui,
  • Shiyi Xiong,
  • Xiaoyu Liu,
  • Yingjun Yang,
  • Xiuxiu Wei,
  • Gang Zou,
  • Zhonghua Wang,
  • Xing Wei,
  • Yaoshen Wang,
  • Yun Zhang,
  • Saiying Yan,
  • Fengyu Wu,
  • Fanwei Zeng,
  • Jian Wang,
  • Tao Duan,
  • Zhiyu Peng,
  • Luming Sun

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12030376
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 3
p. 376

Abstract

Read online

Whole genome sequencing (WGS) is a powerful tool for postnatal genetic diagnosis, but relevant clinical studies in the field of prenatal diagnosis are limited. The present study aimed to prospectively evaluate the utility of WGS compared with chromosomal microarray (CMA) and whole exome sequencing (WES) in the prenatal diagnosis of fetal structural anomalies. We performed trio WGS (≈40-fold) in parallel with CMA in 111 fetuses with structural or growth anomalies, and sequentially performed WES when CMA was negative (CMA plus WES). In comparison, WGS not only detected all pathogenic genetic variants in 22 diagnosed cases identified by CMA plus WES, yielding a diagnostic rate of 19.8% (22/110), but also provided additional and clinically significant information, including a case of balanced translocations and a case of intrauterine infection, which might not be detectable by CMA or WES. WGS also required less DNA (100 ng) as input and could provide a rapid turnaround time (TAT, 18 ± 6 days) compared with that (31 ± 8 days) of the CMA plus WES. Our results showed that WGS provided more comprehensive and precise genetic information with a rapid TAT and less DNA required than CMA plus WES, which enables it as an alternative prenatal diagnosis test for fetal structural anomalies.

Keywords