Future Transportation (Apr 2023)

Operational Impacts of On-Demand Ride-Pooling Service Options in Birmingham, AL

  • Furat Salman,
  • Virginia P. Sisiopiku,
  • Jalal Khalil,
  • Wencui Yang,
  • Da Yan

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/futuretransp3020030
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 3, no. 2
pp. 519 – 534

Abstract

Read online

Transportation Network Companies (TNCs) use online-enabled apps to provide on-demand transportation services. TNCs facilitate travelers to connect with drivers that can offer them rides for compensation using driver-owned vehicles. The ride requests can be for (a) individual or (b) shared rides. The latter, also known as ride-pooling services, accommodates requests of unrelated parties with origins and destinations along the same route who agree to share the same vehicle, usually at a discounted fare. Uber and Lyft offer ride-pooling services in select markets. Compared to individual ride requests, ride-pooling services hold better promise toward easing urban congestion by reducing the number of automobiles on the road. However, their impact on traffic operations is still not fully understood. Using Birmingham, AL as a case study, this research evaluated the impact that ride-pooling services have on traffic operations using a Multi-Agent Transport Simulation (MATSim) model of the Birmingham metro area. Scenarios were developed to simulate baseline conditions (no TNC service) and ride-pooling availability with two types of ride-pooling services, namely door-to-door (d2d) and stop-based (sB) service and three fleet sizes (200, 400, and 800 vehicles). The results indicate that when TNC vehicles are added to the network, the Vehicle Kilometers Traveled (VKT) decrease by up to 5.78% for the door-to-door (d2d) service, and up to 2.71% for stop-based (sB) services, as compared to the baseline scenario (no TNC service). The findings also suggest that an increase in the size of the ride-pooling fleet results in a rise in total ride-pooling service VKT, network-wide total VKT, and detour distance. However, increasing the size of the ride-pooling fleet also results in a decrease in the ride request rejection rates, thus benefiting the customers and decreasing the vehicle empty ratio which, in turn, benefits the TNC drivers. The results further suggest that a fleet of 200 ride-pooling vehicles can meet the current demand for service in the Birmingham region at all times, thus it is the optimal ride-pooling TNC fleet size for a medium-sized city such as Birmingham.

Keywords