Atmosphere (Aug 2023)

Comparing Quality Control Procedures Based on Minimum Covariance Determinant and One-Class Support Vector Machine Methods of Aircraft Meteorological Data Relay Data Assimilation in a Binary Typhoon Forecasting Case

  • Jiajing Li,
  • Yu Zhang,
  • Siqi Chen,
  • Duanzhou Shao,
  • Jiazheng Hu,
  • Junjie Feng,
  • Qichang Tan,
  • Deping Wu,
  • Jiaqi Kang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14091341
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 9
p. 1341

Abstract

Read online

This study investigates the impact of assimilating Aircraft Meteorological Data Relay (AMDAR) observations on the prediction of two typhoons, Nesat and Haitang (2017), using the Gridpoint Statistical Interpolation (GSI) assimilation system and the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model. Two quality control (QC) methods, Minimum Covariance Determinant (MCD) and one-class Support Vector Machine (OCSVM), were employed to perform QC on the AMDAR observations before data assimilation. The QC results indicated that both methods significantly reduced kurtosis, skewness, and discrepancies between the AMDAR data and the reanalysis data. The data distribution after applying the MCD-QC method exhibited a closer resemblance to a Gaussian distribution. Four numerical experiments were conducted to assess the impact of different AMDAR data qualities on typhoon forecasting, including a control experiment without data assimilation (EXP-CNTL), assimilating all AMDAR observations (EXP-RAW), assimilating observations after applying MCD-QC (EXP-MCD), and assimilating observations after applying OCSVM-QC (EXP-SVM). The results demonstrated that using AMDAR data in assimilation improved the track and intensity prediction of the typhoons. Furthermore, utilizing QC before assimilation enhanced the performance of track forecasting prediction, with EXP-MCD showing the best performance. As for intensity prediction, the three assimilation experiments exhibited varying strengths and weaknesses at different times, with EXP-MCD showing smaller intensity forecast errors on average.

Keywords