Thoracic Cancer (Mar 2021)

Clinical influence of switching companion diagnostic tests for EGFR‐TKs from Therascreen to Cobas v2

  • Ken Uchibori,
  • Natsuki Takano,
  • Ryo Manabe,
  • Ryosuke Tsugitomi,
  • Shinsuke Ogusu,
  • Takehiro Tozuka,
  • Hiroaki Sakamoto,
  • Hiroshi Yoshida,
  • Yoshiaki Amino,
  • Ryo Ariyasu,
  • Satoru Kitazono,
  • Noriko Yanagitani,
  • Makoto Nishio

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13797
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 6
pp. 906 – 913

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Several companion diagnostic (CDx) tests for epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR‐TKIs) have been approved. In our institute, the CDx test for EGFR‐TKIs was changed from the Therascreen test (Therascreen) to the Cobas EGFR v2 test (Cobas) because only Cobas was approved for the use of osimertinib in patients with EGFR‐mutated non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with T790M mutations. The clinical influence of switching the CDx test has not yet been examined comprehensively. Methods All serial patients with lung cancer tested for EGFR mutations with CDx tests between February 2014 and February 2016 at the Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research (JFCR) were enrolled in this analysis. Results Therascreen was used as a CDx test for EGFR‐TKI therapy in 607 patients between February 2014 and January 2015, and Cobas was used in 621 patients between February 2015 and February 2016. EGFR mutations were detected in 218 patients (35.9%) and 244 patients (39.3%) tested with Therascreen and Cobas, respectively. At the initial diagnosis, 400 and 459 patients were tested with Therascreen and Cobas, respectively. EGFR mutation subtypes, including del19, L858R, and others, were detected in 13.0%, 17.0%, and 2.5% of patients using Therascreen and 17.4%, 14.4%, and 1.5% of patients using Cobas, respectively. Conclusions No significant impact of switching from Therascreen to Cobas as the CDx test for EGFR mutations in clinical practice was observed. However, the detection pattern of the EGFR mutation subtypes between the two CDx tests was slightly different. Key points Significant findings of the study We examined the influence of changing the EGFR test in 1228 patients in total. The detection rate of EGFR mutations was similar. However, the detection pattern for EGFR subtype mutations was slightly different between the two tests. What this study adds Switching CDx tests from target polymerase chain reaction (PCR)‐ to next‐generation sequencing (NGS)‐based methods may lead to obvious changes in clinical practice. When the CDx test is required to change, the investigation of this influence is warranted in future studies.

Keywords