Effects of an intensive experimental protocol on health, fertility, and production in transition dairy cows

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Animal experimentation is required to investigate complex physiological relationships and facilitates development of evidence-based knowledge. However, experimental protocols can interfere with the daily routine of the animals, result in stress and pain, and have adverse effects on health and production. The goal of this study was to investigate the effects of an intensive experimental protocol on health traits and production in transition dairy cows. Eighty experimental dairy Holstein cows (EXP group) underwent serial protocol-based clinical and ultrasonographic examinations, puncture of the jugular vein for blood collection or drug application, and liver biopsy samples, 14 d before until 42 d after parturition. Controls (CTR group) included 206 cows from the same herd, which fulfilled the same inclusion criteria and were kept under the same production management but were not handled for the purpose of this study. Procedure-related effects with a potentially negative effect on health and production were recorded. Furthermore, production, fertility and culling traits of the 2 groups (CTR, EXP) were compared. Most procedure-related adverse effects were associated with transcutaneous liver biopsies and included diffuse inflammation of the skin incision in 11.9% (42 of 320), abscessation of the skin or subcutis in 4.6% (11 of 240), and increased liver echogenicity of the biopsy site in 10.4% (27 of 240). The experimental procedures had a negative effect on milk yield at the start [days in milk (DIM) 5–50, difference: 2.3 kg, standard error (SE): 0.8 kg] and end of lactation (DIM 251–300, difference: 2.0 kg, SE: 1.0 kg; DIM 301–350, difference: 2.3 kg, SE: 1.2 kg) resulting in a lower 305-d milk yield in the EXP group than in the CTR group (difference: 472 kg, SE 214 kg). The milk fat % was higher in the EXP group than in the CTR group from 251 DIM onward (DIM 251–300, difference: 0.20%, SE: 0.09%; DIM 301–350, difference: 0.41%, SE: 0.17%). Also, the somatic cell score was higher in the EXP group than in the CTR group, during early (5–50 DIM, difference: 0.43, SE: 0.22) and from mid-lactation onward (DIM 151–200, difference: 0.43, SE: 0.2; DIM 201–250, difference: 0.49, SE: 0.22; DIM 251–300, difference: 0.55, SE: 0.25; DIM 301–350, difference: 0.61, SE: 0.28). Experimental procedures had no effect on first service conception rate and time to pregnancy, but had a positive effect on stillbirth rate with fewer stillbirths in the CTR group (0%) than in the EXP group (3.9%). Furthermore, experimental handling had no effect on time to culling or type of culling, whereby poor production was a more frequent reason noted for culling in the EXP group. Procedure-associated impairment of production in dairy cows is rarely reported and allows the estimation of the effects of such a study protocol on animal health and production. As a limitation for the interpretation of the results, the number of animals included and conduction in one single herd have to be considered.

Keywords

• animal experiments
• biopsy
• stress
• manipulation
• sampling