Respiratory Research (Nov 2005)

Invasive versus noninvasive measurement of allergic and cholinergic airway responsiveness in mice

  • Hohlfeld Jens M,
  • Braun Armin,
  • Korolewitz Regina,
  • Baelder Ralf,
  • Ziegert Michaela,
  • Glaab Thomas,
  • Mitzner Wayne,
  • Krug Norbert,
  • Hoymann Heinz G

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-6-139
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 6, no. 1
p. 139

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background This study seeks to compare the ability of repeatable invasive and noninvasive lung function methods to assess allergen-specific and cholinergic airway responsiveness (AR) in intact, spontaneously breathing BALB/c mice. Methods Using noninvasive head-out body plethysmography and the decrease in tidal midexpiratory flow (EF50), we determined early AR (EAR) to inhaled Aspergillus fumigatus antigens in conscious mice. These measurements were paralleled by invasive determination of pulmonary conductance (GL), dynamic compliance (Cdyn) and EF50 in another group of anesthetized, orotracheally intubated mice. Results With both methods, allergic mice, sensitized and boosted with A. fumigatus, elicited allergen-specific EAR to A. fumigatus (p Conclusion We conclude that invasive and noninvasive pulmonary function tests are capable of detecting both allergen-specific and cholinergic AR in intact, allergic mice. The invasive determination of GL and Cdyn is superior in sensitivity, whereas the noninvasive EF50 method is particularly appropriate for quick and repeatable screening of respiratory function in large numbers of conscious mice.