PLoS ONE (Jan 2023)

Comprehensive review of safety in Experimental Human Pneumococcal Challenge.

  • Ryan E Robinson,
  • Christopher Myerscough,
  • Nengjie He,
  • Helen Hill,
  • Wendi A Shepherd,
  • Patricia Gonzalez-Dias,
  • Konstantinos Liatsikos,
  • Samuel Latham,
  • Fred Fyles,
  • Klara Doherty,
  • Phoebe Hazenberg,
  • Fathimath Shiham,
  • Daniella Mclenghan,
  • Hugh Adler,
  • Vicki Randles,
  • Seher Zaidi,
  • Angela Hyder-Wright,
  • Elena Mitsi,
  • Hassan Burhan,
  • Ben Morton,
  • Jamie Rylance,
  • Maia Lesosky,
  • Stephen B Gordon,
  • Andrea M Collins,
  • Daniela M Ferreira

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284399
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 18, no. 5
p. e0284399

Abstract

Read online

IntroductionExperimental Human Pneumococcal Challenge (EHPC) involves the controlled exposure of adults to a specific antibiotic-sensitive Streptococcus pneumoniae serotype, to induce nasopharyngeal colonisation for the purpose of vaccine research. The aims are to review comprehensively the safety profile of EHPC, explore the association between pneumococcal colonisation and frequency of safety review and describe the medical intervention required to undertake such studies.MethodsA single-centre review of all EHPC studies performed 2011-2021. All recorded serious adverse events (SAE) in eligible studies are reported. An unblinded meta-analysis of collated anonymised individual patient data from eligible EHPC studies was undertaken to assess the association between experimental pneumococcal colonisation and the frequency of safety events following inoculation.ResultsIn 1416 individuals (median age 21, IQR 20-25), 1663 experimental pneumococcal inoculations were performed. No pneumococcal-related SAE have occurred. 214 safety review events were identified with 182 (12.85%) participants presenting with symptoms potentially in keeping with pneumococcal infection, predominantly in pneumococcal colonised individuals (colonised = 96/658, non-colonised = 86/1005, OR 1.81 (95% CI 1.28-2.56, P = DiscussionNo SAEs were identified directly relating to pneumococcal inoculation. Safety review for symptoms was infrequent but occurred more in experimentally colonised participants. Most symptoms were mild and resolved with conservative management. A small minority required antibiotics, notably those serotype 3 inoculated.ConclusionOutpatient human pneumococcal challenge can be conducted safely with appropriate levels of safety monitoring procedures in place.