Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease (Jan 2022)

Respective Mediating Effects of Social Position and Work Environment on the Incidence of Common Cardiovascular Risk Factors

  • Nicolas Hoertel,
  • Marina Sanchez Rico,
  • Frédéric Limosin,
  • Joël Ménard,
  • Céline Ribet,
  • Sébastien Bonenfant,
  • Marcel Goldberg,
  • Marie Zins,
  • Pierre Meneton

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.021373
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 2

Abstract

Read online

Background Social position and work environment are highly interrelated and their respective contribution to cardiovascular risk is still debated. Methods and Results In a cohort of 20 625 French workers followed for 25 years, discrete‐time survival analysis with reciprocal mediating effects, adjusted for sex, age, and parental history of early coronary heart disease, was performed using Bayesian structural equation modeling to simultaneously investigate the extent to which social position mediates the effect of work environment and, inversely, the extent to which work environment mediates the effect of social position on the incidence of common cardiovascular risk factors. Depending on the factor, social position mediates 2% to 53% of the effect of work environment and work environment mediates 9% to 87% of the effect of social position. The mediation by work environment is larger than that by social position for the incidence of obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, sleep complaints, and depression (mediation ratios 1.32–41.5, 6.67 when modeling the 6 factors together). In contrast, the mediation by social position is larger than that by work environment for the incidence of nonmoderate alcohol consumption, smoking, and leisure‐time physical inactivity (mediation ratios 0.16–0.69, 0.26 when modeling the 3 factors together). Conclusions The incidence of behavioral risk factors seems strongly dependent on social position whereas that of clinical risk factors seems closely related to work environment, suggesting that preventive strategies should be based on education and general practice for the former and on work organization and occupational medicine for the latter.

Keywords