Cancer Medicine (Aug 2023)

The prognostic and predictive roles of plasma C‐reactive protein and PD‐L1 in non‐small cell lung cancer

  • Saara Kuusisalo,
  • Antti Tikkanen,
  • Elisa Lappi‐Blanco,
  • Timo Väisänen,
  • Aija Knuuttila,
  • Satu Tiainen,
  • Jarkko Ahvonen,
  • Sanna Iivanainen,
  • Jussi P. Koivunen

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6262
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 15
pp. 16087 – 16097

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Anti‐PD‐(L)1 agents have revolutionized the treatment paradigms of non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), while predictive biomarkers are limited. It has been previously shown that systemic inflammation, indicated by elevated C‐reactive protein (CRP) level, is associated with a poor prognosis in anti‐PD‐(L)1 treated. The aim of the study was to analyze the prognostic and predictive value of CRP in addition to traditional prognostic and predictive markers and tumor PD‐L1 score. Methods We identified all NSCLC patients (n = 329) who had undergone PD‐L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) analysis at Oulu University Hospital 2015–22. CRP levels, treatment history, immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy details, and survival were collected. The patients were categorized based on CRP levels (≤10 vs. >10) and PD‐L1 TPS scores (10) carried a high negative predictive value with a median PFS of 4.11 months (CI 95% 0.00–9.63), which was similar to patients with low PD‐L1 (4.11 months, CI 95% 2.61–5.60). Conclusions Adding plasma CRP levels to PD‐L1 TPS significantly increased the predictive value of sole PD‐L1. Furthermore, patients with high CRP beard little benefit from anti‐PD‐(L)1 therapies independent of PD‐L1 score. The study highlights the combined evaluation of plasma CRP and PD‐L1 TPS as a negative predictive marker for ICI therapies.

Keywords