Veterinary Sciences (Jun 2022)

Experimental Infection of Pigs with a ST 245 <i>Brachyspira hyodysenteriae</i> Isolated from an Asymptomatic Pig in a Herd with No History of Swine Dysentery

  • José Paulo H. Sato,
  • Amanda G. S. Daniel,
  • Carlos E. R. Pereira,
  • Mariana R. Andrade,
  • Ricardo P. Laub,
  • Michelle P. Gabardo,
  • Luisa V. A. Otoni,
  • Nubia R. Macedo,
  • Javier A. Barrera-Zarate,
  • Roberto M. C. Guedes

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9060286
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 6
p. 286

Abstract

Read online

Swine dysentery (SD) is characterized by a severe mucohemorrhagic colitis caused by infection with Brachyspira species. In infected herds the disease causes considerable financial loss due to mortality, slow growth rates, poor feed conversion, and costs of treatment. B. hyodysenteriae is the most common etiological agent of SD and infection is usually associated with disease. However, isolated reports have described low pathogenic strains of B. hyodysenteriae. The aim of this study was to describe an experimental infection trial using a subclinical B. hyodysenteriae isolated from an animal without clinical signs and from a disease-free herd, to evaluate the pathogenicity and clinical pathological characteristics compared to a highly clinical isolate. Forty-eight 5-week-old pigs were divided into three groups: control, clinical and the subclinical isolates. The first detection/isolation of B. hyodysenteriae in samples of the animals challenged with a known clinical B. hyodysenteriae strain (clinical group) occurred 5th day post inoculation. Considering the whole period of the study, 11/16 animals from this group were qPCR positive in fecal samples, and diarrhea was observed in 10/16 pigs. In the subclinical isolate group, one animal had diarrhea. There were SD large intestine lesions in 3 animals at necropsy and positive B. hyodysenteriae isolation in 7/15 samples of the subclinical group. In the control group, no diarrhea, gross/microscopic lesions, or qPCR positivity were observed. Clinical signs, bacterial isolation, macroscopic and histologic lesions were significantly difference among groups, demonstrating low pathogenicity of the subclinical isolate in susceptible pigs.

Keywords