Chinese Medical Journal (Feb 2021)

Evaluation of blood pressure lowering effect by generic and brand-name antihypertensive drugs treatment: a multicenter prospective study in China

  • Shu-Yuan Zhang,
  • Li-Yuan Tao,
  • Yun-Yun Yang,
  • Tao Kong,
  • Cun-Jin Wu,
  • Yang Wang,
  • Jing-Zhou Chen,
  • Lei Song,
  • Yi-Bo Wang,
  • Ru-Tai Hui,
  • Wei-Li Zhang,
  • Yin-Yan Jie,
  • Xiu-Yuan Hao

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000001360
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 134, no. 3
pp. 292 – 301

Abstract

Read online

Abstract. Background. Generic drugs are bioequivalent to their brand-name counterparts; however, concerns still exist regarding the effectiveness and safety of generic drugs because of small sample sizes and short follow-up time in most studies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term antihypertensive efficacy, cost-effectiveness and cardiovascular outcomes of generic drugs compared with brand-name drugs. Methods. In a multicenter, community-based study including 7955 hypertensive patients who were prospectively followed up for an average of 2.5 years, we used the propensity-score-matching method to match the patients using brand-name drugs to those using generic drugs in a ratio of 1:2, 2176 patients using brand-name drugs and 4352 patients using generic drugs. Results. There were no significant differences between generic drugs and brand-name drugs in blood pressure (BP)-lowering efficacy, BP control rate, and cardiovascular outcomes including coronary heart disease and stroke. The adjusted mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) of systolic BP (SBP)-lowering was –7.9 mmHg (95% CI, –9.9 to –5.9) in the brand-name drug group and –7.1 mmHg (95% CI, –9.1 to –5.1) in the generic drug group after adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, number of antihypertensive drugs and traditionally cardiovascular risk factors. Among patients aged <60 years, brand-name drugs had a higher BP control rate (47% vs. 41%; P = 0.02) and a greater effect in lowering SBP compared with generic drugs, with the between-group difference of 1.5 mmHg (95% CI, 0.2–2.8; P = 0.03). BP control rate was higher in male patients using brand-name drugs compared with those using generic drugs (46% vs. 40%; P = 0.01). Generic drugs treatment yielded an average annual incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $315.4 per patient per mmHg decrease in SBP compared with brand-name drugs treatment. Conclusions. Our data suggested that generic drugs are suitable and cost-effective in improving hypertension management and facilitating public health benefits, especially in low- and middle-income areas.