Cannulation Technique of Vascular Access in Hemodialysis and the Impact on the Arteriovenous Fistula Survival: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Adequate cannulation technique (CT) methods and successful puncture are essential for hemodialysis (HD) and arteriovenous fistula (AVF) maintenance. This systematic review and meta-analysis was designed to identify which CT allows better AVF primary patency and lower rates of complications in HD patients. The search was carried out on the CINAHL, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Joanna Briggs Institute Library databases to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing clinical outcomes of buttonhole (BH) versus rope ladder cannulation (RL) from 2010 to 2022. The Risk-of-Bias (Rob 2) tool was used for RCTs and the ROBINS-I was used for non-randomized studies. RevMan 5.4 was used for the meta-analysis. A total of five RCTs, one quasi-randomized controlled trial, and six observational studies were included. When compared with RL cannulation, BH cannulation significantly increased bacteremia (RR, 2.76, 95% CI (1.14, 6.67), p = 0.02) but showed no differences in AVF primary patency (HR, 1.06, 95% CI (0.45, 4.21), p = 0.90). There was no thrombosis reduction (RR, 0.51, 95% CI (0.23, 1.14), p = 0.10) or intervention number reduction (RR, 0.93, 95% CI (0.49, 1.80), p = 0.84) with BH. Outcomes like pain, hematoma, and aneurism could not be merged due to a lack of data, reported as medians, as well as due to different definitions. The quality in general was poor and the heterogeneity among the studies prevented us from merging the outcomes.

Keywords

• meta-analysis
• end-stage renal disease
• chronic kidney disease
• hemodialysis
• buttonhole
• rope ladder