BMJ Open Gastroenterology (Dec 2024)

Update from 2010 (standard operating procedure): protocol for the 2024 British Society of Gastroenterology Guidelines on colorectal surveillance in inflammatory bowel disease

  • Adrian C Bateman,
  • Bu Hayee,
  • Sunil Dolwani,
  • Ailsa Hart,
  • James E East,
  • A John Morris,
  • Ibrahim Al Bakir,
  • Tim Raine,
  • Nigel J Trudgill,
  • Anjan Dhar,
  • Marco Novelli,
  • Matt Rutter,
  • Gaurav Bhaskar Nigam,
  • Misha Kabir,
  • Ana Wilson,
  • Shahida Din,
  • Venkataraman Subramanian,
  • Neil A Shepherd,
  • Morris Gordon,
  • Christopher Andrew Lamb,
  • Simon Leedham,
  • Chris Healey,
  • O D Faiz,
  • Lydia White,
  • Ruth Wakeman,
  • Maggie Vance,
  • Vassiliki Sinopoulou

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2024-001541
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 1

Abstract

Read online

Introduction The evolving landscape of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) necessitates refining colonoscopic surveillance guidelines. This study outlines methodology adopted by the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) Guideline Development Group (GDG) for updating IBD colorectal surveillance guidelines.Methods and analysis The ‘Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation’ (GRADE) approach, as outlined in the GRADE handbook, was employed. Thematic questions were formulated using either the ‘patient, intervention, comparison and outcome’ format or the ‘current state of knowledge, area of interest, potential impact and suggestions from experts in the field’ format. The evidence review process included systematic reviews assessed using appropriate appraisal tools. An extensive list of potential outcomes was compiled from literature and expert consultations and then ranked by GDG members. The top outcomes were identified for evidence synthesis in three key areas: utility of surveillance in IBD, quality of bowel preparation and use of advanced imaging techniques in colonoscopy for IBD. Risk thresholding exercises determined specific risk levels for different surveillance strategies and intervals. This approach enabled the GDG to establish precise thresholds for interventions based on relative and absolute risk assessments, directly informing the stratification of surveillance recommendations. Significance of effect sizes (small, moderate, large) will guide the final GRADE assessment of the evidence.Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval is not applicable. By integrating clinical expertise, patient experiences and innovative methodologies like risk thresholding, we aim to deliver actionable recommendations for IBD colorectal surveillance. This protocol, complementing the main guidelines, offers GDGs, clinical trialists and practitioners a framework to inform future research and enhance patient care and outcomes.