Animals (Nov 2024)

Evaluation of Recovery Time and Quality After Two Different Post-Operative Doses of Medetomidine in Spanish Purebred Horses Anaesthetized with Medetomidine–Isoflurane Partial Intravenous Anaesthesia

  • Francisco Medina-Bautista,
  • Juan Morgaz,
  • Juan Manuel Domínguez,
  • Rocío Navarrete-Calvo,
  • Antonia Sánchez de Medina,
  • Setefilla Quirós-Carmona,
  • María del Mar Granados

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14223308
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 22
p. 3308

Abstract

Read online

Recovery from general anaesthesia is risky in horses. Alpha2-agonist administration after anaesthesia enhances the quality of recovery but may prolong this phase. Recovery time and quality were investigated after medetomidine administration at the end of general anaesthesia in a prospective, randomised, masked and clinical study. Horses underwent medetomidine–isoflurane partial intravenous anaesthesia. Medetomidine (0.5 or 1 µg/kg) IV was administered just after isoflurane was discontinued. The duration of different recovery phases and the number of attempts were recorded. A composite scale (from 1—excellent to 6—accident) was used for quality assessment. Mann—Whitney U-test was performed (p < 0.05). Twenty-seven horses per group were included. Results for 0.5 and 1 µg/kg groups were as follows: lateral recumbency time: 35 (24–45) and 43 (35–55) minutes; sternal recumbency time: 6 (3–15) and 5 (2–15) minutes; total recovery time: 47 (40–59) and 49 (42–62) minutes; number of attempts to sternal: 1 (1–1) and 1 (1–2) and to standing: 1 (1–3) and 1 (1–2); and, quality: 2 (1–2) and 2 (1–2), respectively. No significant differences between the groups were found. Medetomidine 0.5 µg/kg dose did not decrease the recovery time but maintained the recovery quality.

Keywords