Revista de Filosofia (Apr 2016)

The priority of Democratic Egalitarianism

  • Facundo García Valverde

DOI
https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_RESF.2016.v41.n1.52108
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 41, no. 1
pp. 79 – 96

Abstract

Read online

In this paper, I will show that strict versions of Luck Egalitarianism and Democratic Egalitarianism are implausible since both claim that the object of egalitarian justice should single out one and only one value. On the contrary, weak versions are acceptable since they allow a plural composition of the egalitarian justice object.This plural understanding of the object of egalitarian justice demands the justification of normative priorities since each conception would justify conflictive demands. In this article I will make three arguments to justify the normative priority of Democratic Egalitarianism over Luck Egalitarianism: a purely instrumentalone, another concerning expressive meaning of public policies and one last argument will show why we need a division of egalitarian moral work.

Keywords