BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making (Oct 2021)

Assessment of quality of routine health information system data and associated factors among departments in public health facilities of Harari region, Ethiopia

  • Adisu Tafari Shama,
  • Hirbo Shore Roba,
  • Admas Abera Abaerei,
  • Teferi Gebru Gebremeskel,
  • Negga Baraki

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01651-2
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 21, no. 1
pp. 1 – 12

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Despite the improvements in the knowledge and understanding of the role of health information in the global health system, the quality of data generated by a routine health information system is still very poor in low and middle-income countries. There is a paucity of studies as to what determines data quality in health facilities in the study area. Therefore, this study was aimed to assess the quality of routine health information system data and associated factors in public health facilities of Harari region, Ethiopia. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted in all public health facilities in the Harari region of Ethiopia. The department-level data were collected from respective department heads through document reviews, interviews, and observation checklists. Descriptive statistics were used to data quality and multivariate logistic regression was run to identify factors influencing data quality. The level of significance was declared at P value < 0.05. Result The study found good quality data in 51.35% (95% CI 44.6–58.1) of the departments in public health facilities in the Harari Region. Departments found in the health centers were 2.5 times more likely to have good quality data as compared to those found in the health posts. The presence of trained staffs able to fill reporting formats (AOR = 2.474; 95% CI 1.124–5.445) and provisions of feedbacks (AOR = 3.083; 95% CI 1.549–6.135) were also significantly associated with data quality. Conclusion The level of good data quality in the public health facilities was less than the expected national level. Lack of trained personnel able to fill the reporting format and feedback were the factors that are found to be affecting data quality. Therefore, training should be provided to increase the knowledge and skills of the health workers. Regular supportive supervision and feedback should also be maintained.

Keywords