Frontiers in Oncology (May 2018)

Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Management of Patients With Brain Metastases of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Indications, Decision Tools and Future Directions

  • Dianne Hartgerink,
  • Britt van der Heijden,
  • Dirk De Ruysscher,
  • Dirk De Ruysscher,
  • Alida Postma,
  • Linda Ackermans,
  • Ann Hoeben,
  • Monique Anten,
  • Philippe Lambin,
  • Karin Terhaag,
  • Arthur Jochems,
  • Andre Dekker,
  • Andre Dekker,
  • Janna Schoenmaekers,
  • Lizza Hendriks,
  • Jaap Zindler,
  • Jaap Zindler

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2018.00154
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8

Abstract

Read online

Brain metastases (BM) frequently occur in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Most patients with BM have a limited life expectancy, measured in months. Selected patients may experience a very long progression-free survival, for example, patients with a targetable driver mutation. Traditionally, whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) has been the cornerstone of the treatment, but its indication is a matter of debate. A randomized trial has shown that for patients with a poor prognosis, WBRT does not add quality of life (QoL) nor survival over the best supportive care. In recent decades, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become an attractive non-invasive treatment for patients with BM. Only the BM is irradiated to an ablative dose, sparing healthy brain tissue. Intracranial recurrence rates decrease when WBRT is administered following SRS or resection but does not improve overall survival and comes at the expense of neurocognitive function and QoL. The downside of SRS compared with WBRT is a risk of radionecrosis (RN) and a higher risk of developing new BM during follow-up. Currently, SRS is an established treatment for patients with a maximum of four BM. Several promising strategies are currently being investigated to further improve the indication and outcome of SRS for patients with BM: the effectivity and safety of SRS in patients with more than four BM, combining SRS with systemic therapy such as targeted agents or immunotherapy, shared decision-making with SRS as a treatment option, and individualized isotoxic dose prescription to mitigate the risk of RN and further enhance local control probability of SRS. This review discusses the current indications of SRS and future directions of treatment for patients with BM of NSCLC with focus on the value of SRS.

Keywords