Association Between Experimental Pain Thresholds and Trajectories of Postoperative Recovery Measures After Benign Hysterectomy [Corrigendum]

Abstract

Lukas P, Gerdle B, Nilsson L, et al. J Pain Res. 2022;15:3657–3674. Table 3 on page 3663, the number of patients in PPT was 403 and not 402, the corrected Table 3 is below. Table 5 on page 3665, several of the numbers and frequencies, in particular in the HPT >25th-percentile column are incorrect, and the legends of the CPT groups has been mixed up. However, all p-values are correctly noted. The corrected Table 5 is below. Figure 2 on pages 3667 and 3668, the graphic legends for the CPT groups, have been mixed up in Figure 2A–C, the corrected Figure 2 is below. Figure 2 Graphic presentation of outcome variables that were statistically significant between pain threshold categories (repeated measures ANOVA adjusted for confounders). (A) Maximum pain intensity in relation to cold pain threshold (CPT) categories. (B) Symptom sum score in relation to CPT categories. (C) Dose of non-opioids (defined daily dose) in relation to CPT categories. (D) Dose of non-opioids (defined daily dose) in relation to heat pain threshold (HPT) categories. Plots indicate means and bars show 95% confidence intervals. The authors apologize and advise none of these errors influence the results or the conclusion. Table 3 Pain threshold Modalities, Locations Of Measurement, the Mean of the Three Measurements on Each Location, and the Average of All Locations. Median (Range) and Lower Quartiles Presented for Pressure and Heat Pain Thresholds, and Upper Quartile for Cold Table 5 Demographic and Clinical Factors in Relation to Pain Thresholds for Pressure (PPT) and Heat (HPT) Categorized After the 25th -Percentile, and Cold (CPT) After the 75th -Percentile