Bone & Joint Open (Aug 2022)

Patient experiences of scaphoid waist fractures and their treatment <subtitle>a qualitative investigation</subtitle>

  • Paul A. Leighton,
  • Stephen D. Brealey,
  • Joseph J. Dias

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.38.BJO-2022-0042.R1
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 3, no. 8
pp. 641 – 647

Abstract

Read online

AimsTo explore individuals’ experience of a scaphoid waist fracture and its subsequent treatment.MethodsA purposive sample was created, consisting of 49 participants in the Scaphoid Waist Internal Fixation for Fractures Trial of initial surgery compared with plaster cast treatment for fractures of the scaphoid waist. The majority of participants were male (35/49) and more younger participants (28/49 aged under 30 years) were included. Participants were interviewed six weeks or 52 weeks post-recruitment to the trial, or at both timepoints. Interviews were semistructured and analyzed inductively to generate cross-cutting themes that typify experience of the injury and views upon the treatment options.ResultsData show that individual circumstances might exaggerate or mitigate the limitations associated with a scaphoid fracture, and that an individual’s sense of recovery is subjective and more closely aligned with perceived functional abilities than it is with bone union. Misconceptions that surgery promises a speedier and more secure form of recovery means that some individuals, whose circumstances prescribe a need for quick return to function, express a preference for this treatment modality. Clinical consultations need to negotiate the imperfect relationship between bone union, normal function, and an individual’s sense of recovery. Enhancing patients’ perceptions of regaining function, with removable splints and encouraging home exercise, will support satisfaction with care and discourage premature risk-taking.ConclusionClinical decision-making in the management of scaphoid fractures should recognize that personal circumstances will influence how functional limitations are experienced. It should also recognize that function overrides a concern for bone union, and that the consequences of fractures are poorly understood. Where possible, clinicians should reinforce in individuals a sense that they are making progress in their recovery.Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(8):641–647.

Keywords