Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions (Jan 2022)

Loss of corneal nerves and brain volume in mild cognitive impairment and dementia

  • Georgios Ponirakis,
  • Hanadi Al Hamad,
  • Adnan Khan,
  • Ioannis N. Petropoulos,
  • Hoda Gad,
  • Mani Chandran,
  • Ahmed Elsotouhy,
  • Marwan Ramadan,
  • Priya V. Gawhale,
  • Marwa Elorrabi,
  • Masharig Gadelseed,
  • Rhia Tosino,
  • Anjum Arasn,
  • Pravija Manikoth,
  • Yasmin H.M. Abdelrahim,
  • Mahmoud A Refaee,
  • Noushad Thodi,
  • Surjith Vattoth,
  • Hamad Almuhannadi,
  • Ziyad R. Mahfoud,
  • Harun Bhat,
  • Ahmed Own,
  • Ashfaq Shuaib,
  • Rayaz A. Malik

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/trc2.12269
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 1
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Introduction This study compared the capability of corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain volumetry for the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. Methods In this cross‐sectional study, participants with no cognitive impairment (NCI), MCI, and dementia underwent assessment of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), MRI brain volumetry, and CCM. Results Two hundred eight participants with NCI (n = 42), MCI (n = 98), and dementia (n = 68) of comparable age and gender were studied. For MCI, the area under the curve (AUC) of CCM (76% to 81%), was higher than brain volumetry (52% to 70%). For dementia, the AUC of CCM (77% to 85%), was comparable to brain volumetry (69% to 93%). Corneal nerve fiber density, length, branch density, whole brain, hippocampus, cortical gray matter, thalamus, amygdala, and ventricle volumes were associated with cognitive impairment after adjustment for confounders (All P’s < .01). Discussion The diagnostic capability of CCM compared to brain volumetry is higher for identifying MCI and comparable for dementia, and abnormalities in both modalities are associated with cognitive impairment.

Keywords