Design of Input Signal for System Identification of a Generic Fighter Configuration

Abstract

This article investigates the design of time-accurate input signals in the angle-of-attack and pitch rate space to identify the aerodynamic characteristics of a generic triple-delta wing configuration at subsonic speeds. Regression models were created from the time history of signal simulations in DoD HPCMP CREATETM-AV/Kestrel software. The input signals included chirp, Schroeder, pseudorandom binary sequence (PRBS), random, and sinusoidal signals. Although similar in structure, the coefficients of these regression models were estimated based on the specific input signals. The signals covered a wide range of angle-of-attack and pitch rate space, resulting in varying regression coefficients for each signal. After creating and validating the models, they were used to predict static aerodynamic data at a wide range of angles of attack but with zero pitch rate. Next, slope coefficients and dynamic derivatives in the pitch direction were estimated from each signal. These predictions were compared with each other as well as with the ONERA wind tunnel data and some CFD calculations from the DLR TAU code provided by the NATO Science and Technology Organization research task group AVT-351. Subsequently, the models were used to predict different pitch oscillations at various mean angles of attack with given amplitudes and frequencies. Again, the model predictions were compared with wind tunnel data. Final predictions involved responses to new signals from different models. A feed-forward neural network was then used to model pressure coefficients on the upper surface of the vehicle at different spanwise sections for each signal and the validated models were used to predict pressure data at different angles of attack. Overall, the models predict similar integrated forces and moments, with the main discrepancies appearing at higher angles of attack. All models failed to predict the stall behavior observed in the measurements and CFD data. Regarding the pressure data, the PRBS signal provided the best accuracy among all the models.

Keywords

• system identification
• CFD
• signal design
• reduced-order aerodynamic models