Infection and Drug Resistance (Aug 2024)

Antifungal Activity of the Dichloromethane Extract of CaoHuangGuiXiang Formula Against Candida auris by in vitro and in vivo Evaluation

  • Yue H,
  • Xu X,
  • Peng B,
  • Wang X,
  • Zhang S,
  • Tian J,
  • Wang S,
  • Song M,
  • Liu Q

Journal volume & issue
Vol. Volume 17
pp. 3547 – 3559

Abstract

Read online

Huizhen Yue,1– 3 Xiaolong Xu,1– 3 Bing Peng,1– 3 Xuanyu Wang,1 Shengnan Zhang,1 Jinhao Tian,4 Shuo Wang,1 Maifen Song,1 Qingquan Liu1– 3 1Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; 2Beijing Institute of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; 3Beijing Key Laboratory of Basic Research with Traditional Chinese Medicine on Infectious Diseases, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; 4Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Qingquan Liu, Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University, No. 23 Gallery Backstreet, Dongcheng District, Beijing, People’s Republic of China, Email [email protected]: CaoHuangGuiXiang (CHGX) formula is a traditional Chinese medicine for the treatment of Candida-related infection. However, its antifungal mechanisms against the emerging fungal pathogen Candida auris remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the antifungal activity of the dichloromethane extract of CHGX (CHGX-DME) and clarified its antifungal mechanims against C. auris.Methods: The major components of CHGX-DME were identified by ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Then, the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) assay and the time-kill kinetic assay were performed to investigate the in vitro antifungal activity of CHGX-DME against C. auris, including 8 isolates of 4 discrete clades and 2 special phenotypes (filamentous and aggregative). Furthermore, the effect of CHGX-DME on biofilm development was examined. In addition, the in vivo toxicity and efficacy of CHGX-DME were evaluated in a Galleria mellonella infection model.Results: First, 20 major compounds in CHGX-DME were detected and characterized. The MIC50% and MIC90% of CHGX-DME against C. auris isolates ranged from 50– 200 mg/L and 100– 400 mg/L, respectively. At 400 mg/L, CHGX-DME was able to efficiently kill more than 70% and 90% of C. auris cells after 3 hours and 6 hours of treatment, respectively. This notable antifungal activity exhibited a dosage- and time-dependent manner. Moreover, CHGX-DME not only played a critical role in inhibiting the proliferation of filamentous and aggregative cells, but also showed restricting effect on biofilm development in C. auris. Importantly, it significantly improved the survival rate and reduced the fungal burden in G. mellonella infection models, suggesting a remarkable treatment effect against C. auris infection.Conclusion: CHGX-DME exhibited potent antifungal activity against C. auris and significantly ameliorated this fungal infection in the G. mellonella model, confirming that it would be a promising antifungal drug for the troublesome and emerging fungal pathogen C. auris.Keywords: Candida auris, multidrug resistance, CaoHuangGuiXiang formula, aggregative form, biofilm formation, antifungal efficiency

Keywords