Photonics (Nov 2024)

A Refined Model for Ablation Through Cavitation Bubbles with Ultrashort Pulse Lasers

  • Shwetabh Verma,
  • Samuel Arba Mosquera

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics11111047
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 11
p. 1047

Abstract

Read online

(1) Background: Ultrashort high-energy laser pulses may cause interaction mechanisms, including photodisruption and plasma-induced ablation in the medium. It is not always easy to distinguish between these two processes, as both interaction mechanisms rely on plasma generation and overlap. The purpose of this paper is to discuss prominent cavitation bubble models describing photodisruption and plasma-induced ablation and to explore their nature for different threshold energies. This exploration will help to better distinguish the two interaction mechanisms. As a second aim, we present an alternative model for the low-energy regime close to the laser-induced optical breakdown (LIOB) threshold, representing the phenomenological effect of the plasma-induced ablation regime. (2) Methods: The cavitation bubble models for photodisruption and plasma-induced ablation were used to calculate the bubble radius for a series of threshold energies (ETh = 30, 50, 70, and 300 nJ) that loosely represent commercial systems currently used in ultrashort-pulse tissue ablation. Taking a photodisruption model coefficient commonly used in the literature, the root mean square error between the two interaction models was minimized using the generalized reduced gradient fitting method to calculate the optimum scaling factors for the plasma model. The refined models with optimized coefficients were compared for a range of pulse and threshold energies. (3) Results: For low ETh (30, 50, and 70 nJ), the plasma-induced ablation model dominates for low energies that are close to the threshold energy. The photodisruption model dominates for high energies that are well above the threshold energy. At very high pulse energies, for all the simulated cases, the photodisruption model transitions and crosses over to the plasma-induced ablation model. The cross-over points from which the photodisruption model dominates tend to be reduced for larger ETh. A new universally applicable model for plasma-induced ablation has been hypothesized that considers the cavitation bubble volume and potentially better explains the bubble dynamics during intrastromal processes. (4) Conclusions: This theoretical exploration and the comparison of the outcomes to empirical data substantiate that inadvertently using the photodisruption model to explain the cavitation bubble dynamics for the entire spectrum of pulse energies and laser systems might provide erroneous estimates of cavitation bubble sizes. A reliable estimate of the true size (the maximum radius) of the cavitation bubble can be reasonably retrieved as the maximum predicted size from the fit of the photodisruption model and the newly proposed plasma-induced ablation model at any given pulse energy.

Keywords