Improved mortality and haemodynamics with milrinone in cardiogenic shock due to acute decompensated heart failure

Abstract

Abstract Aims Studies in cardiogenic shock (CS) often have a heterogeneous population of patients, including those with acute myocardial infarction and acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF‐CS). The therapeutic profile of milrinone may benefit patients with ADHF‐CS. We compared the outcomes and haemodynamic trends in ADHF‐CS receiving either milrinone or dobutamine. Methods and results Patients presenting with ADHF‐CS (from 2014 to 2020) treated with a single inodilator (milrinone or dobutamine) were included in this study. Clinical characteristics, outcomes, and haemodynamic parameters were collected. The primary endpoint was 30 day mortality, with censoring at the time of transplant or left ventricular assist device implantation. A total of 573 patients were included, of which 366 (63.9%) received milrinone and 207 (36.1%) received dobutamine. Patients receiving milrinone were younger, had better kidney function, and lower lactate at admission. In addition, patients receiving milrinone received mechanical ventilation or vasopressors less frequently, whereas a pulmonary artery catheter was more frequently used. Milrinone use was associated with a lower adjusted risk of 30 day mortality (hazard ratio = 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.35–0.77). After propensity‐matching, the use of milrinone remained associated with a lower mortality (hazard ratio = 0.51, 95% confidence interval 0.27–0.96). These findings were associated with improved pulmonary artery compliance, stroke volume, and right ventricular stroke work index. Conclusions The use of milrinone compared with dobutamine in patients with ADHF‐CS is associated with lower 30 day mortality and improved haemodynamics. These findings warrant further study in future randomized controlled trials.

Keywords

• Milrinone
• Dobutamine
• Cardiogenic shock
• Inotropes
• Heart failure