RMD Open (Jul 2024)

Biological use influences the impact of inflammation on risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in rheumatoid arthritis

  • George Athanasios Karpouzas,
  • Anne Grete Semb,
  • Ellen-Margrethe Hauge,
  • Dionicio Angel Galarza-Delgado,
  • Miguel A González-Gay,
  • Solbritt Rantapää-Dahlqvist,
  • Petros P Sfikakis,
  • Virginia Pascual-Ramos,
  • Irazú Contreras-Yáñez,
  • Carol Hitchon,
  • Durga Prasanna Misra,
  • Iris J Colunga-Pedraza,
  • Alfonso Corrales,
  • George Kitas,
  • Linda Tsang,
  • Hani El-Gabalawy,
  • José Ramón Azpiri-lópez,
  • Sarah R Ormseth,
  • Patrick Dessein,
  • Piet Leonardus Cornelis Maria van Riel

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004546
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 3

Abstract

Read online

Objectives Chronic inflammation promotes cardiovascular risk in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) improve disease activity and cardiovascular disease outcomes. We explored whether bDMARDs influence the impact of disease activity and inflammatory markers on long-term cardiovascular risk in RA.Methods We studied 4370 participants without cardiovascular disease in a 10-country observational cohort of patients with RA. Endpoints were (1) major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) encompassing myocardial infarction, stroke and cardiovascular death; and (2) any ischaemic cardiovascular events (iCVE) including MACE plus revascularisation, angina, transient ischaemic attack and peripheral arterial disease.Results Over 26 534 patient-years, 239 MACE and 362 iCVE occurred. The interaction between 28-joint Disease Activity Score with C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) and bDMARD use was significant for MACE (p=0.017), suggesting the effect of DAS28-CRP on MACE risk differed among bDMARD users (n=515) and non-users (n=3855). DAS28-CRP (per unit increase) is associated with MACE risk in bDMARD non-users (HR 1.21 (95% CI 1.07 to 1.37)) but not users (HR 0.69 (95% CI 0.40 to 1.20)). The interaction between CRP (per log unit increase) and bDMARD use was also significant for MACE (p=0.011). CRP associated with MACE risk in bDMARD non-users (HR 1.16 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.30)), but not users (HR 0.65 (95% CI 0.36 to 1.17)). No interaction was observed between bDMARD use and DAS28-CRP (p=0.167) or CRP (p=0.237) for iCVE risk.Conclusions RA activity and inflammatory markers associated with risk of MACE in bDMARD non-users but not users suggesting the possibility of biological-specific benefits locally on arterial wall independently of effects on systemic inflammation.