Frontiers in Psychology (Oct 2024)

An international estimate of the prevalence of differing visual imagery abilities

  • David J. Wright,
  • Matthew W. Scott,
  • Matthew W. Scott,
  • Sarah N. Kraeutner,
  • Pamela Barhoun,
  • Maurizio Bertollo,
  • Mark J. Campbell,
  • Mark J. Campbell,
  • Baptiste M. Waltzing,
  • Stephan F. Dahm,
  • Maaike Esselaar,
  • Cornelia Frank,
  • Robert M. Hardwick,
  • Ian Fuelscher,
  • Ben Marshall,
  • Nicola J. Hodges,
  • Christian Hyde,
  • Paul S. Holmes

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1454107
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15

Abstract

Read online

The aim of this research was to establish prevalence estimates for aphantasia, hypophantasia, typical imagery ability, and hyperphantasia in a large multi-national cohort. In Study 1, the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire was completed by 3,049 participants. Results indicated prevalence estimates of 1.2% for aphantasia, 3% for hypophantasia, 89.9% for typical imagery ability, and 5.9% for hyperphantasia. In Study 2, to replicate these findings in a larger sample, the Study 1 data were combined with openly available data from previous prevalence studies to create a total sample of 9,063 participants. Re-analysis of this data confirmed prevalence estimates of 0.9% for aphantasia, 3.3% for hypophantasia, 89.7% for typical imagery ability, and 6.1% for hyperphantasia. These robust and up-to-date estimates provide enhanced clarity to researchers regarding the prevalence of differing visual imagery abilities and provide a platform for future studies exploring the role of visual imagery in various cognitive and behavioral tasks.

Keywords