Communications Earth & Environment (Apr 2023)

Climate delay discourses present in global mainstream television coverage of the IPCC’s 2021 report

  • James Painter,
  • Joshua Ettinger,
  • David Holmes,
  • Loredana Loy,
  • Janaina Pinto,
  • Lucy Richardson,
  • Laura Thomas-Walters,
  • Kjell Vowles,
  • Rachel Wetts

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00760-2
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 4, no. 1
pp. 1 – 12

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Recent scholarship suggests that groups who oppose acting on climate change have shifted their emphasis from attacking the credibility of climate science itself to questioning the policies intended to address it, a position often called ‘response skepticism’. As television is the platform most used by audiences around the world to receive climate information, we examine 30 news programmes on 20 channels in Australia, Brazil, Sweden, the UK and USA which included coverage of the 2021 report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) on the Physical Science. Using manual quantitative content analysis, we find that skepticism about the science of climate change is still prevalent in channels that we have classified as ‘right-wing’, but largely absent from channels classified as ‘mainstream’. Forms of response skepticism are particularly common in ‘right-wing’ channels, but also present in some ‘mainstream’ coverage. Two of the most prominent discourses question the perceived economic costs of taking action and the personal sacrifices involved. We explore the implications of our findings for future research and climate communication.