Animal Microbiome (Mar 2022)

Resistomes and microbiome of meat trimmings and colon content from culled cows raised in conventional and organic production systems

  • Margaret D. Weinroth,
  • Kevin M. Thomas,
  • Enrique Doster,
  • Amit Vikram,
  • John W. Schmidt,
  • Terrance M. Arthur,
  • Tommy L. Wheeler,
  • Jennifer K. Parker,
  • Ayanna S. Hanes,
  • Najla Alekoza,
  • Cory Wolfe,
  • Jessica L. Metcalf,
  • Paul S. Morley,
  • Keith E. Belk

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42523-022-00166-z
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 4, no. 1
pp. 1 – 16

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background The potential to distribute bacteria resistant to antimicrobial drugs in the meat supply is a public health concern. Market cows make up a fifth of the U.S. beef produced but little is known about the entire population of bacteria (the microbiome) and entirety of all resistance genes (the resistome) that are found in this population. The objective of this study was to characterize and compare the resistomes and microbiome of beef, dairy, and organic dairy market cows at slaughter. Methods Fifty-four (N = 54) composite samples of both colon content and meat trimmings rinsate samples were collected over six visits to two harvest facilities from cows raised in three different production systems: conventional beef, conventional dairy, and organic dairy (n = 3 samples per visit per production system). Metagenomic DNA obtained from samples were analyzed using target-enriched sequencing (resistome) and 16S rRNA gene sequencing (microbiome). Results All colon content samples had at least one identifiable antimicrobial resistance gene (ARG), while 21 of the 54 meat trimmings samples harbored at least one identifiable ARGs. Tetracycline ARGs were the most abundant class in both colon content and carcass meat trimmings. The resistome found on carcass meat trimmings was not significantly different by production system (P = 0.84, R2 = 0.00) or harvest facility (P = 0.10, R2 = 0.09). However, the resistome of colon content differed (P = 0.01; R2 = 0.05) among production systems, but not among the harvest facilities (P = 0.41; R2 = 0.00). Amplicon sequencing revealed differences (P 0.05). Conclusions These data provide a baseline characterization of an important segment of the beef industry and highlight the effect that the production system where cattle are raised and the harvest facilities where an animal is processed can impact associated microbiome and resistomes.

Keywords