Intensive Care Medicine Experimental (Apr 2018)

Preliminary experience on the safety and tolerability of mechanical “insufflation-exsufflation” in subjects with artificial airway

  • Miguel Sánchez-García,
  • Passio Santos,
  • Gema Rodríguez-Trigo,
  • Fernando Martínez-Sagasti,
  • Tomás Fariña-González,
  • Ángela del Pino-Ramírez,
  • Carlos Cardenal-Sánchez,
  • Beatriz Busto-González,
  • Mónica Requesens-Solera,
  • Mercedes Nieto-Cabrera,
  • Francisco Romero-Romero,
  • Antonio Núñez-Reiz

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-018-0173-6
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 6, no. 1
pp. 1 – 9

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Catheter suctioning of respiratory secretions in intubated subjects is limited to the proximal airway and associated with traumatic lesions to the mucosa and poor tolerance. “Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation” exerts positive pressure, followed by an abrupt drop to negative pressure. Potential advantages of this technique are aspiration of distal airway secretions, avoiding trauma, and improving tolerance. Methods We applied insufflation of 50 cmH2O for 3 s and exsufflation of − 45 cmH2O for 4 s in patients with an endotracheal tube or tracheostomy cannula requiring secretion suctioning. Cycles of 10 to 12 insufflations-exsufflations were performed and repeated if secretions were aspirated and visible in the proximal artificial airway. Clinical and laboratory parameters were collected before and 5 and 60 min after the procedure. Subjects were followed during their ICU stay until discharge or death. Results Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation was applied 26 times to 7 male and 6 female subjects requiring suctioning. Mean age was 62.6 ± 20 years and mean Apache II score 23.3 ± 7.4 points. At each session, a median of 2 (IQR 1; 2) cycles on median day of intubation 11.5 (IQR 6.25; 25.75) were performed. Mean insufflation tidal volume was 1043.6 ± 649.9 ml. No statistically significant differences were identified between baseline and post-procedure time points. Barotrauma, desaturation, atelectasis, hemoptysis, or other airway complication and hemodynamic complications were not detected. All, except one, of the mechanical insufflation-exsufflation sessions were productive, showing secretions in the proximal artificial airway, and were well tolerated. Conclusions Our preliminary data suggest that mechanical insufflation-exsufflation may be safe and effective in patients with artificial airway. Safety and efficacy need to be confirmed in larger studies with different patient populations. Trial registration EudraCT 2017-005201-13 (EU Clinical Trials Register).

Keywords