Cancer Medicine (Dec 2022)

One‐year COVID‐19 outcomes on the oncology care patient pathway: Results of a French descriptive, cross‐sectional comprehensive study (ONCOCARE‐COV)

  • Léonard Laurent,
  • Mathias Brugel,
  • Claire Carlier,
  • Florentin Clere,
  • Aurélie Bertrand,
  • Damien Botsen,
  • Camille Boulagnon‐Rombi,
  • Véronique Dalstein,
  • Adeline Debreuve‐Theresette,
  • Sophie Deguelte,
  • Christian Garbar,
  • Rachid Mahmoudi,
  • Antonin Marechal,
  • David Morland,
  • Jean‐Baptiste Rey,
  • Claire Schvartz,
  • Catherine Vallet,
  • Yacine Merrouche,
  • Florian Slimano,
  • Olivier Bouché

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4817
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 24
pp. 4865 – 4879

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background The COVID‐19 pandemic led to a widely documented disruption in cancer care pathway. Since a resurgence of the pandemic was expected after the first lockdown in France, the global impact on the cancer care pathway over the year 2020 was investigated. Aims This study aimed to describe the changes in the oncology care pathway for cancer screening, diagnosis, assessment, diagnosis annoucement procedure and treatment over a one‐year period. Materials & Methods The ONCOCARE‐COV study was a comprehensive, retrospective, descriptive, and cross‐sectional study comparing the years 2019 and 2020. All key indicators along the cancer care pathway assessing the oncological activity over four periods were described. This study was set in a high‐volume, public, single tertiary care center divided in two complementary sites (Reims University Hospital and Godinot Cancer Institute, Reims, France) which was located in a high COVID‐19 incidence area during both peaks of the outbreak. Results A total of 26,566 patient's files were active during the year 2020. Breast screening (−19.5%), announcement dedicated consultations (−9.2%), Intravenous and Hyperthermic Intraoperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPECs) (−25%), and oncogeriatric evaluations (−14.8%) were heavily disrupted in regard to 2020 activity. We identified a clear second outbreak wave impact on medical announcement procedures (October, −14.4%), radiotherapy sessions (October, −16%), number of new health record discussed in multidisciplinary tumor board meeting (November, −14.6%) and HIPECs (November, −100%). Moreover, 2020 cancer care activity stagnated compared to 2019. Discussion The oncological care pathway was heavily disrupted during the first and second peaks of the COVID‐19 outbreak. Between lockdowns, we observed a remarkable but non‐compensatory recovery as well as a lesser impact from the pandemic resurgence. However, in absence of an increase in activity, a backlog persisted. Conclusion Public health efforts are needed to deal with the consequences of the COVID‐19 pandemic on the oncology care pathway.

Keywords