Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine (Dec 2023)

Prognostic Value of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Chronic Aortic Regurgitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Jin-Rong Ni,
  • Wen-Long Xin,
  • Yuan Hu,
  • Shi-Dong Liu,
  • Jin-Kui Li,
  • Zun-Hui Wan,
  • Jun-Qiang Lei

DOI
https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2412359
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 24, no. 12
p. 359

Abstract

Read online

Background: Chronic aortic regurgitation (AR) is a common valvular disease characterized by an overload of left ventricular volume and pressure. Accurate assessment of the heart from all angles is crucial for effective clinical management and prognostic evaluation of AR patients. As an advanced imaging technique, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has become the gold standard for assessing cardiac volume and function. Accordingly, this study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of CMR in chronic AR. Methods: EMBASE, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched for clinical studies published between inception and July 19, 2022. Only studies that used CMR to assess patients with chronic isolated AR and provided prognostic data were included. Results: For our analysis, 11 studies, which involved 1702 subjects and follow-up periods of 0.6–9.7 years, were eligible. We identified 13 CMR-related parameters associated with AR prognosis. With aortic valve surgery as the outcome, we estimated the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for four of these parameters: aortic regurgitation fraction (ARF), aortic regurgitation volume (ARV), left ventricle end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), and LV end-systolic volume (LVESV). The pooled HR for ARF was found to be 4.31 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12–16.59, p = 0.034), while that for ARV was 3.88 (95% CI: 0.71–21.04, p = 0.116). Additionally, the combined HRs of LVEDV and LVESV were estimated to be 2.20 (95% CI: 1.04–4.67, p = 0.039) and 3.14 (95% CI: 1.22–8.07, p = 0.018), respectively. Conclusions: The assessment of ARF, LVEDV, and LVESV via CMR has significant prognostic value in predicting the prognosis of AR patients with aortic valve surgery as an endpoint. It is recommended to consider using multi-parameter CMR in the clinical management of AR patients for timely interventions and effective prognostic evaluation.

Keywords