Journal of Translational Medicine (Jan 2019)

Identification of a serum-based miRNA signature for response of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma to neoadjuvant chemotherapy

  • Yukiko Niwa,
  • Suguru Yamada,
  • Fuminori Sonohara,
  • Keisuke Kurimoto,
  • Masamichi Hayashi,
  • Mitsuru Tashiro,
  • Naoki Iwata,
  • Mitsuro Kanda,
  • Chie Tanaka,
  • Daisuke Kobayashi,
  • Goro Nakayama,
  • Masahiko Koike,
  • Michitaka Fujiwara,
  • Yasuhiro Kodera

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-018-1762-6
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17, no. 1
pp. 1 – 9

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has become the standard of care for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) which is one of the most lethal cancers, to improve resectability and prognosis. On this basis, to provide individually optimized therapy for ESCC, a minimally-invasive biomarker for response to NAC is strongly desired. This study aimed to identify the miRNA signature in serum specimens taken from ESCC patients undergoing NAC through genome-wide microarray technology. Methods Comprehensive miRNA-expression profiles of serum specimens from ESCC patients before initial treatment were analyzed using microarray. A qPCR assay was performed to test the robustness of identified serum-based miRNA signature for discriminating response to NAC with serum specimens taken from 100 ESCC cases undergoing NAC. Results We prioritized 62 miRNAs differentially expressed between responders and non-responders (absolute log2 fold change > 1.0, corresponding P < 0.05) and from the 62 miRNAs, we selected the miR-23a-5p, miR-193b-5p, and miR-873-3p, which were highly expressed in non-responders. Following qPCR analysis indicated the expression of miR-193b-5p and miR-873-3p in serum specimens were significantly higher in non-responders among three selected miRNAs (P = 0.004 and 0.001, respectively). Subsequently, we developed 2-miR-model (miR-193b-5p and miR-873-3p), 3-miR-model, and 2-miR + lymphatic invasion (ly) model based on logistic regression analysis, which achieved the better area under the receiver operating characteristic curves than those of single miRNAs as 2-miR-model, 0.70 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.82); 3-miR-model, 0.70 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.83); and 2-miR + ly, 0.73 (95% CI 0.60–0.86), respectively. Furthermore, we compared the detective power of the combined model: 2-miR + ly for discriminating non-responders to NAC, to other pretreatment clinical features. Consequently, 2-miR + ly model was superior to serum SCC antigen with great significance (P = 0.01) and to ly, and clinical T stage with marginal significance (P = 0.18, 0.07, respectively). Conclusions Collectively, we demonstrated that the potential of a multi-miRNA biomarker for identifying NAC response in ESCC is realistic, and can be used in the clinic with the further validation.

Keywords