Cancer Reports (Dec 2023)

Meta‐analysis of microarray data to determine gene indicators involved in the cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer

  • Somayeh Hashemi Sheikhshabani,
  • Zeinab Amini‐Farsani,
  • Nesa Kazemifard,
  • Parastoo Modarres,
  • Zahra Amini‐Farsani,
  • Mir Davood Omrani,
  • Soudeh Ghafouri‐Fard

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1884
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 6, no. 12
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Significant miss‐expressed gene indicators contributing to cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer have not been completely understood. It seems that several regulatory genes and signaling pathways are associated with the emergence of the chemo‐resistant phenotype. Aims Here, a meta‐analysis approach was adopted to assess deregulated genes involved in relapse after the first line of chemotherapy (cisplatin). Methods and Results To do so, six ovarian cancer libraries were gathered from GEO repository. Batch effect removal and quality assessment, and boxplots and PCA were performed using SVA and ggplot2 packages in R, respectively. Cisplatin‐resistant and ‐sensitive ovarian cancer groups were compared with find genes with significant expression changes using linear regression models in the LIMMA R package. The significance threshold for DEGs was taken as adj p‐value logFC > 1. A total of 261 genes were identified to have significant differential expression levels in the cisplatin‐resistant versus cisplatin‐sensitive group. Among the 10 top up‐regulated and down‐regulated genes, PITX2, SNCA, and EPHA7 (up), as well as TMEM98 (down) are indirect upstream regulators of PI3K/AKT signaling pathway, contributing greatly to the development of chemo‐resistance in cancer via promoting cell proliferation, survival, and cell cycle progression as well as inhibiting apoptosis. Moreover, a comprehensive assessment of DEGs revealed the dysregulation of not only membrane ion channels KCa1.1, Kv4, and CACNB4, affecting cell excitability, proliferation, and apoptosis but also cell adhesion proteins COL4A6, EPHA3, and CD9, affecting the attachment of normal cells to ECM and apoptosis, introducing good options to reverse cisplatin resistance. Conclusion Our results predict and suggest that upstream regulators of PI3K/AKT signaling pathway, ion channels, and cell adhesion proteins play important roles in cisplatin resistance development in ovarian cancer.

Keywords