Indian Heart Journal (May 2021)

Detecting sub-clinical disease activity in patients with chronic rheumatic valvular heart disease

  • Aayush Kumar Singal,
  • Velayoudam Devagourou,
  • Milind Padmakar Hote,
  • Shiv Kumar Choudhary,
  • Neeraj Parakh,
  • Ruma Ray,
  • Ramakrishnan Lakshmy,
  • Ganesan Karthikeyan

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 73, no. 3
pp. 313 – 318

Abstract

Read online

Objective: Valve disease progression in rheumatic heart disease(RHD) is generally attributed to recurrent attacks of acute rheumatic fever(ARF). However, persistence of chronic sub-clinical inflammation remains a plausible but unproven cause. Non-invasive means to identify sub-clinical inflammation may facilitate research efforts towards understanding its contribution to disease progression. Methods: Patients with chronic RHD, without clinical evidence of ARF, undergoing elective valve surgery were enrolled. Sub-clinical inflammation was ascertained by histological evaluation of left atrial appendage and valve tissue excised during surgery. We assessed the diagnostic utility of Gallium-67 scintigraphy imaging, and inflammatory biomarkers, hsCRP, IL-2, IL-6, Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha(TNF-α), Interferon-gamma(IFN-γ), and Serum Amyloid A(SAA), in identifying patients with sub-clinical inflammation. Results: Of the 93 RHD patients enrolled(mean age 34 ± 11 years, 45% females), 86 were included in final analysis. Sub-clinical inflammation was present in 27 patients(31.4%). Patients with dominant regurgitant lesions were more likely to have sub-clinical inflammation compared to those with stenotic lesions, though this association was not statistically significant(dominant regurgitant lesions vs isolated mitral stenosis: OR 3.5, 95%CI 0.68–17.96, p = 0.133). Inflammatory biomarkers were elevated in the majority of patients: hsCRP, IL-2, IL-6, TNF-α, and IFN-γ in 44%, 89%, 90%, 79%, and 81% patients, respectively. However, there was no significant association between biomarker elevation and histologically ascertained sub-clinical inflammation. Ga-67 imaging was unable to identify inflammation in the 15 patients in whom it was performed. Conclusion: Sub-clinical inflammation is common in RHD patients. Conventional inflammatory markers are elevated in the majority, but aren’t discriminatory enough to identify the presence of histologic inflammation.

Keywords