Myths and methodologies: Considerations for evaluating the time course of thermoregulatory adaptation during heat acclimation

Abstract

Abstract Since the early 1900s, repeated heat exposure has been used as a method to induce physiological adaptations that enhance our ability to tolerate heat stress during athletic and occupational pursuits. Much of this work has been dedicated to quantifying the time course of adaptation and identifying the minimum duration of acclimation required to optimise performance or enhance safety. To achieve this, investigators have typically applied classical (constant load) heat acclimation, whereby 60–90 min exercise is performed at the same absolute or relative intensity in a hot environment for 3–24 days, with adaptations evaluated using an identical forcing function test before and after. This approach has provided a foundation from which to develop our understanding of changes in thermoregulatory function, but it has several, frequently overlooked shortcomings, which have resulted in misconceptions concerning the time course of adaptation. It is frequently suggested that most of the thermoregulatory adaptations during heat acclimation occur within a week, but this is an oversimplification and a predictable artefact of the experimental designs used. Consequently, the time course of complete human adaptation to heat remains poorly understood and appears to vary considerably due to numerous individual factors. The purpose of this communication is to highlight the key methodological considerations required when interpreting the existing literature documenting adaptation over time. We also propose potential means by which to improve the way we induce and quantify the magnitude of adaptation to expedite discovery.

Keywords

• acclimatisation
• constant‐stress
• heat adaptation
• isothermal
• overload