EBioMedicine (Dec 2020)

Phase 2a, open-label, dose-escalating, multi-center pharmacokinetic study of favipiravir (T-705) in combination with oseltamivir in patients with severe influenza

  • Yeming Wang,
  • Wu Zhong,
  • Alex Salam,
  • Joel Tarning,
  • Qingyuan Zhan,
  • Jian-an Huang,
  • Heng Weng,
  • Changqing Bai,
  • Yanhong Ren,
  • Koichi Yamada,
  • Dayan Wang,
  • Qiang Guo,
  • Qiongqiong Fang,
  • Sakurai Tsutomu,
  • Xiaohui Zou,
  • Haibo Li,
  • Annelies Gillesen,
  • Lyndsey Castle,
  • Cheng Chen,
  • Hongyan Li,
  • Jing Zhen,
  • Binghuai Lu,
  • Jun Duan,
  • Liping Guo,
  • Jinfang Jiang,
  • Ruiyuan Cao,
  • Guohui Fan,
  • Jintong Li,
  • Frederick G. Hayden,
  • Chen Wang,
  • Peter Horby,
  • Bin Cao

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 62
p. 103125

Abstract

Read online

Background: The pharmacokinetics and appropriate dose regimens of favipiravir are unknown in hospitalized influenza patients; such data are also needed to determine dosage selection for favipiravir trials in COVID-19. Methods: In this dose-escalating study, favipiravir pharmacokinetics and tolerability were assessed in critically ill influenza patients. Participants received one of two dosing regimens; Japan licensed dose (1600 mg BID on day 1 and 600 mg BID on the following days) and the higher dose (1800 mg/800 mg BID) trialed in uncomplicated influenza. The primary pharmacokinetic endpoint was the proportion of patients with a minimum observed plasma trough concentration (Ctrough) ≥20 mg/L at all measured time points after the second dose. Results: Sixteen patients were enrolled into the low dose group and 19 patients into the high dose group of the study. Favipiravir Ctrough decreased significantly over time in both groups (p 80% of the duration of treatment of the two dose regimens evaluated (18.8% and 42.1% of patients for low and high dose regimen, respectively). Increasing the favipravir dosage predicted a higher proportion of patients reaching this threshold of 20 mg/L, suggesting that dosing regimens of ≥3600/2600 mg might be required for adequate concentrations. The two dosing regimens were well-tolerated in critical ill patients with influenza. Conclusion: The two dosing regimens proposed for uncomplicated influenza did not achieve our pre-defined treatment threshold.

Keywords