PLoS ONE (Jan 2024)

Predicting the spatial distribution of wintering golden eagles to inform full annual cycle conservation in western North America.

  • Zachary P Wallace,
  • Bryan E Bedrosian,
  • Jeffrey R Dunk,
  • David W LaPlante,
  • Brian Woodbridge,
  • Brian W Smith,
  • Jessi L Brown,
  • Todd M Lickfett,
  • Katherine Gura,
  • Dave Bittner,
  • Ross H Crandall,
  • Rob Domenech,
  • Todd E Katzner,
  • Kevin J Kritz,
  • Stephen B Lewis,
  • Michael J Lockhart,
  • Tricia A Miller,
  • Katie Quint,
  • Adam Shreading,
  • Steve J Slater,
  • Dale W Stahlecker

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297345
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 19, no. 1
p. e0297345

Abstract

Read online

Wildlife conservation strategies focused on one season or population segment may fail to adequately protect populations, especially when a species' habitat preferences vary among seasons, age-classes, geographic regions, or other factors. Conservation of golden eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) is an example of such a complex scenario, in which the distribution, habitat use, and migratory strategies of this species of conservation concern vary by age-class, reproductive status, region, and season. Nonetheless, research aimed at mapping priority use areas to inform management of golden eagles in western North America has typically focused on territory-holding adults during the breeding period, largely to the exclusion of other seasons and life-history groups. To support population-wide conservation planning across the full annual cycle for golden eagles, we developed a distribution model for individuals in a season not typically evaluated-winter-and in an area of the interior western U.S. that is a high priority for conservation of the species. We used a large GPS-telemetry dataset and library of environmental variables to develop a machine-learning model to predict spatial variation in the relative intensity of use by golden eagles during winter in Wyoming, USA, and surrounding ecoregions. Based on a rigorous series of evaluations including cross-validation, withheld and independent data, our winter-season model accurately predicted spatial variation in intensity of use by multiple age- and life-history groups of eagles not associated with nesting territories (i.e., all age classes of long-distance migrants, and resident non-adults and adult "floaters", and movements of adult territory holders and their offspring outside their breeding territories). Important predictors in the model were wind and uplift (40.2% contribution), vegetation and landcover (27.9%), topography (14%), climate and weather (9.4%), and ecoregion (8.7%). Predicted areas of high-use winter habitat had relatively low spatial overlap with nesting habitat, suggesting a conservation strategy targeting high-use areas for one season would capture as much as half and as little as one quarter of high-use areas for the other season. The majority of predicted high-use habitat (top 10% quantile) occurred on private lands (55%); lands managed by states and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) had a lower amount (33%), but higher concentration of high-use habitat than expected for their area (1.5-1.6x). These results will enable those involved in conservation and management of golden eagles in our study region to incorporate spatial prioritization of wintering habitat into their existing regulatory processes, land-use planning tasks, and conservation actions.