PLoS ONE (Jan 2022)

Effects of surgical and FFP2 masks on cardiopulmonary exercise capacity in patients with heart failure

  • Alexander Kogel,
  • Pierre Hepp,
  • Tina Stegmann,
  • Adrienn Tünnemann-Tarr,
  • Roberto Falz,
  • Patrick Fischer,
  • Felix Mahfoud,
  • Ulrich Laufs,
  • Sven Fikenzer

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17, no. 8

Abstract

Read online

Aims Surgical and FFP2 masks are recommended to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2. The cardiopulmonary effects of facemasks in patients with chronic heart failure are unknown. This prospective, cross-over study quantified the effects of wearing no mask (nm), surgical mask (sm), and FFP2 mask (ffpm) in patients with stable heart failure. Methods 12 patients with clinically stable chronic heart failure (HF) (age 63.8±12 years, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 43.8±11%, NTProBNP 573±567 pg/ml) underwent spiroergometry with and without masks in a randomized sequence. Comfort/discomfort was assessed using a standardized questionnaire. Results Maximum power was reduced with both types of masks (nm: 108.3 W vs. sm: 101.2 W vs. ffpm: 95.6 W, pConclusion Both surgical and FFP masks reduce exercise capacity in heart failure patients, while FFP2 masks reduce oxygen uptake and peak ventilation. This reduction in cardiopulmonary performance should be considered in heart failure patients whose daily life activities are often just as challenging as exercise is for healthy adults.