The Impact of Information Relevancy and Interactivity on Intensivists’ Trust in a Machine Learning–Based Bacteremia Prediction System: Simulation Study

Abstract

Abstract BackgroundThe exponential growth in computing power and the increasing digitization of information have substantially advanced the machine learning (ML) research field. However, ML algorithms are often considered “black boxes,” and this fosters distrust. In medical domains, in which mistakes can result in fatal outcomes, practitioners may be especially reluctant to trust ML algorithms. ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to explore the effect of user-interface design features on intensivists’ trust in an ML-based clinical decision support system. MethodsA total of 47 physicians from critical care specialties were presented with 3 patient cases of bacteremia in the setting of an ML-based simulation system. Three conditions of the simulation were tested according to combinations of information relevancy and interactivity. Participants’ trust in the system was assessed by their agreement with the system’s prediction and a postexperiment questionnaire. Linear regression models were applied to measure the effects. ResultsParticipants’ agreement with the system’s prediction did not differ according to the experimental conditions. However, in the postexperiment questionnaire, higher information relevancy ratings and interactivity ratings were associated with higher perceived trust in the system (PP ConclusionsInformation relevancy and interactivity features should be considered in the design of the user interface of ML-based clinical decision support systems to enhance intensivists’ trust. This study sheds light on the connection between information relevancy, interactivity, and trust in human-ML interaction, specifically in the intensive care unit environment.