Digital Communications and Networks (Jun 2023)

Joint multiple resource allocation for offloading cost minimization in IRS-assisted MEC networks with NOMA

  • Guang Chen,
  • Yueyun Chen,
  • Zhiyuan Mai,
  • Conghui Hao,
  • Meijie Yang,
  • Shuangshuang Han,
  • Liping Du

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 3
pp. 613 – 627

Abstract

Read online

Effective resource allocation can exploit the advantage of intelligent reflective surface (IRS) assisted mobile edge computing (MEC) fully. However, it is challenging to balance the limited energy of MTs and the strict delay requirement of their tasks. In this paper, in order to tackle the challenge, we jointly optimize the offloading delay and energy consumption of mobile terminals (MTs) to realize the delay-energy tradeoff in an IRS-assisted MEC network, in which non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) and multiantenna are applied to improve spectral efficiency. To achieve the optimal delay-energy tradeoff, an offloading cost minimization model is proposed, in which the edge computing resource allocation, signal detecting vector, uplink transmission power, and IRS phase shift coefficient are needed to be jointly optimized. The optimization of the model is a multi-level fractional problem in complex fields with some coupled high dimension variables. To solve the intractable problem, we decouple the original problem into a computing subproblem and a wireless transmission subproblem based on the uncoupled relationship between different variable types. The computing subproblem is proved convex and the closed-form solution is obtained for the edge computing resource allocation. Further, the wireless transmission subproblem is solved iteratively through decoupling the residual variables. In each iteration, the closed-form solution of residual variables is obtained through different successive convex approximation (SCA) methods. We verify the proposed algorithm can converge to an optimum with polynomial complexity. Simulation results indicate the proposed method achieves average saved costs of 65.64%, 11.24%, and 9.49% over three benchmark methods respectively.

Keywords