Neurospine (Sep 2021)

Prioritization of Realignment Associated With Superior Clinical Outcomes for Cervical Deformity Patients

  • Katherine E. Pierce,
  • Peter G. Passias,
  • Avery E. Brown,
  • Cole A. Bortz,
  • Haddy Alas,
  • Lara Passfall,
  • Oscar Krol,
  • Nicholas Kummer,
  • Renaud Lafage,
  • Dean Chou,
  • Douglas C. Burton,
  • Breton Line,
  • Eric Klineberg,
  • Robert Hart,
  • Jeffrey Gum,
  • Alan Daniels,
  • Kojo Hamilton,
  • Shay Bess,
  • Themistocles Protopsaltis,
  • Christopher Shaffrey,
  • Frank A. Schwab,
  • Justin S. Smith,
  • Virginie Lafage,
  • Christopher Ames,

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2040540.270
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 18, no. 3
pp. 506 – 514

Abstract

Read online

Objective To prioritize the cervical parameter targets for alignment. Methods Included: cervical deformity (CD) patients (C2–7 Cobb angle > 10°, cervical lordosis > 10°, cervical sagittal vertical axis [cSVA] > 4 cm, or chin-brow vertical angle > 25°) with full baseline (BL) and 1-year (1Y) radiographic parameters and Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores; patients with cervical [C] or cervicothoracic [CT] Primary Driver Ames type. Patients with BL Ames classified as low CD for both parameters of cSVA (0.050). Decision tree analysis determined cutoffs for radiographic change, prioritizing in the following order: ≥ 42.5° C2–T3 angle, > 35.4° cervical lordosis, -30.8-mm C2–T3 SVA, and ≤ -33.6° TS–CL. Conclusion Certain ratios of correction of cervical parameters contribute to improving neck disability. Prioritizing these radiographic alignment parameters may help optimize patient-reported outcomes for patients undergoing CD surgery.

Keywords