Frontiers in Environmental Science (Aug 2024)

Exploring fecal sludge treatment technologies in humanitarian settings at Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh: a comprehensive assessment of treatment efficiency through characterization of fecal sludge

  • Mohammad Rafiqul Islam,
  • Mohammad Atique Ul Alam,
  • M. Moniruzzaman,
  • M. Moniruzzaman,
  • Faisal Chowdhury Galib,
  • Md. Sakib Hossain,
  • Mohammed Tanveer Hussain,
  • Partha Paul,
  • Md. Tamzid Islam,
  • Salman Zahir Uddin,
  • Md. Shafiqul Islam,
  • Md. Ferdous Hossain,
  • Md. Mominur Rahman,
  • Ahmed Ishtiaque Amin Chowdhury,
  • Tazrina Habib Ananya,
  • Mohammad Ashfaqur Rahman,
  • Martin Worth,
  • Zahid Hayat Mahmud

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1397389
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12

Abstract

Read online

IntroductionEfficient treatment of fecal sludge in densely populated settings is essential as it has a direct impact on public health and the environment. This study presents a comprehensive assessment of fecal sludge treatment technologies in Rohingya camps at Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh, focusing on removal efficiencies and compliance with regulatory standards.MethodsSeventeen treatment plants of five different technologies were evaluated based on removal efficiency and standard discharge guidelines for various physicochemical and microbiological parameters.ResultsWaste Stabilization Pond (WSP) was the top performer compared to four other different treatment technologies evaluated, achieving notable removal rates: 97.3% reduction in E. coli, 100% in helminth eggs, 98.3% for COD, 97.8% for BOD, 98.7% for TSS, 92.1% for TS, 82.8% for phosphate, and 93.3% for total nitrogen. Lime Stabilization Ponds showed lower removal rates, except for E. coli (98.9%), with reductions of 99.7% for helminth eggs, 81.6% for COD, 80.9% for BOD, 86.3% for TSS, 68.6% for TS, and 49.2% for phosphate. Upflow Filters demonstrated good removal efficiencies for E. coli (99.7%), TSS (95.9%), COD (91.7%), BOD (93.5%), and helminth eggs (93.7%). WSP consistently outperformed other technologies across all seasons. Despite these, none of the technologies fully met discharge standards.DiscussionThese findings highlight the need for a comprehensive approach, the combination of physicochemical and biological processes, to enhance efficacy. Promoting improved fecal sludge management technologies through awareness campaigns and technical support can mitigate environmental health risks in densely populated humanitarian settings.

Keywords