Gragoatá (Jun 2007)
"Epistemic Disobedience": the de-colonial option and the meaning of identity in politics
Abstract
Two interrelated theses sustain the argument. First, identity IN politics (rather than identity politics) is a necessary course of thought and action in view of the iron cage of modern (e.g., European from Machiavelli on) political theory. Insofar as modern political theory is—knowingly or not—racist and patriarchal by denying political agency to people classified as inferior (in terms of race, gender, sexuality, etc.), and insofar as they have been denied epistemic agency for the same reason (the second thesis), all de-colonial political moves (non-racist and non-heterosexually patriarchal) must engage in epistemic and political disobedience. “Civil disobedience,” as predicated by Mahatma Ghandi and Martin Luther King, Jr. were great moves indeed. But, civil without epistemic disobedience will remain caught in games ruled by Eurocentric political economy and political theory. Both theses are pillars of the de-colonial option. Thus, the de-colonial option allows us to think in terms of the variegated spectrum of the Marxist left and — on the other hand — of the variegated spectrum of the de-colonial left. --- Original in English