Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology (May 2024)

Individual benefit in heart sparing during DIBH-supported left breast radiotherapy

  • Szilvia Gaál,
  • Zsuzsanna Kahán,
  • Ferenc Rárosi,
  • Gergely H. Fodor,
  • József Tolnai,
  • Bence Deák,
  • Katalin Hideghéty,
  • Zoltán Varga

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 46
p. 100746

Abstract

Read online

Introduction: Deep-inspirational breath hold (DIBH) is an option for heart protection in breast radiotherapy; we intended to study its individual benefit. Materials and Methods: 3DCRT treatment planning was performed in a cohort of 103 patients receiving radiotherapy of the whole breast (WBI)/chest wall (CWI) ± nodal regions (NI) both under DIBH and free breathing (FB) in the supine position, and in the WBI only cases prone (n = 45) position, too. A series of patient-related and heart dosimetry parameters were analyzed. Results: The DIBH technique provided dramatic reduction of all heart dosimetry parameters the individual benefit, however, varied. In the whole population the best predictor of benefit was the ratio of ipsilateral lung volume (ILV)FB and ILVDIBH. In the WBI cohort 9–11 patients and 5–8 patients received less dose to selected heart structures with the DIBH and prone positioning, respectively; based on meeting various dose constraints DIBH was the only solution in 6–13 cases, and prone positioning in 5–6 cases. In addition to other excellent predictors, a small ILVFB or ILVDIBH with outstanding predicting performance (AUC ≥ 0.90) suggested prone positioning. Detailed analysis consistently indicated the outstanding performance of ILVFB and ILVDIBH in predicting the benefit of one over the other technique in lowering the mean heart dose (MHD), left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) mean dose and left ventricle(LV)-V5Gy. The preference of prone positioning was further confirmed by anatomical parameters measured on a single CT scan at the middle of the heart. Performing spirometry in a cohort of 12 patients, vital capacity showed the strongest correlation with ILVFB and ILVDIBH hence this test could be evaluated as a clinical tool for patient selection. Discussion: Individual lung volume measures estimated by spirometry and anatomical data examined prior to acquiring planning CT may support the preference of DIBH or prone radiotherapy for optimal heart protection.

Keywords