PLoS ONE (Jan 2022)

Cut-off value for exercise-induced bronchoconstriction based on the features of the airway obstruction.

  • Noeul Kang,
  • Eunsil Koh,
  • Jin-Young Lee,
  • Woo-Jung Song,
  • Dong-Chull Choi,
  • Byung-Jae Lee

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268969
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17, no. 5
p. e0268969

Abstract

Read online

The current cut-off value for diagnosing exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) in adults-percent fall in FEV1 (ΔFEV1) ≥ 10% after exercise challenge test (ECT)-has low specificity and weak evidences. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the cut-off value for EIB that provides the highest diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. Participants who underwent the ECT between 2007 and 2018 were categorized according to ΔFEV1: definite EIB (ΔFEV1 ≥ 15%), borderline (10% ≤ ΔFEV1 < 15%), and normal (ΔFEV1 < 10%). Distinct characteristics of the definite EIB group were identified and explored in the borderline EIB group. A receiver operating characteristic curve was plotted to determine the optimal cut-off value. Of 128 patients, 60 were grouped as the definite EIB group, 23 as the borderline group, and 45 as the normal group. All participants were men, with a median age of 20 years (interquartile range [IQR:] 19-23 years). The definite EIB group exhibited wheezing on auscultation (P < 0.001), ΔFEV1/FVC ≥ 10% (P < 0.001), and ΔFEF25-75% ≥ 25% (P < 0.001) compared to other groups. Eight (8/23, 34.8%) patients in the borderline group had at least one of these features, but the trend was more similar to that of the normal group than the definite EIB group. A cut-off value of ΔFEV1 ≥ 13.5% had a sensitivity of 98.5% and specificity of 93.5% for EIB. Wheezing on auscultation, ΔFEV1/FVC ≥ 10%, and ΔFEF25-75% ≥ 25% after ECT may be useful for the diagnosis of EIB, particularly in individuals with a ΔFEV1 of 10-15%. For EIB, a higher cut-off value, possibly ΔFEV1 ≥ 13.5%, should be considered as the diagnostic criterion.