Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology (Aug 2022)

Quantification of very late xerostomia in head and neck cancer patients after irradiation

  • Grace C. Blitzer,
  • Nicole M. Rogus‐Pulia,
  • Cristina Paz,
  • Kwangok P. Nickel,
  • Vanessa L. Cannaday,
  • Cynthia A. Kelm‐Nelson,
  • Sailendharan Sudakaran,
  • Richard J. Chappell,
  • Tiffany Glazer,
  • Randall J. Kimple

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.864
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7, no. 4
pp. 1018 – 1024

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Objective Radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck cancer (HNC) can result in severe xerostomia, or the subjective feeling of dry mouth. Characterizing xerostomia is critical to designing future clinical trials investigating how to improve HNC patients' quality of life (QoL). Few studies have investigated the very late (>5 years post‐RT) effects of RT for HNC. We undertook preliminary studies quantifying very late xerostomia. Methods Six adults who underwent RT for HNC at least 5 years prior and reported xerostomia were enrolled. Five healthy adults without a self‐reported history of HNC or xerostomia were enrolled as controls. All participants completed three validated surveys to measure xerostomia‐related QoL. Salivary production rates were measured and compositional analysis of the saliva and oral microbiome was completed. Results The QoL survey scores for the HNC participants were significantly worse as compared to the control participants. The HNC participants produced less unstimulated saliva (p = .02) but not less stimulated saliva. The median salivary mucin significantly higher in HNC participants than in control participants (p = .02). There was no significant difference between the pH, amylase, or total protein. Microbiome analysis revealed alpha diversity to be significantly lower in the HNC participants. Conclusion In the survivors of HNC who suffer from late toxicities, multiple means of measuring toxicity may be useful. We found that in patients with radiation‐induced xerostomia over 5 years after therapy, not only were the QoL surveys significantly worse, as expected, but other measurements such as mucin and oral microbiome diversity were also significantly different. Level of evidence 3.

Keywords